You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What the radiologist needs to know about urolithiasis: part 1--pathogenesis, types, assessment, and variant anatomy.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Roentgenology, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2214/ajr.10.7285 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Phillip M. Cheng, Paymann Moin, Matthew D. Dunn, William D. Boswell, Vinay A. Duddalwar |
| Abstract |
This article reviews types of urinary calculi and their imaging appearances, presents direct and secondary imaging findings of urolithiasis, and provides an overview of treatment methods. Pertinent imaging findings that impact clinical management are highlighted. The implications of complex or variant genitourinary anatomy are reviewed. We outline a standard format for the reporting of urolithiasis to facilitate informed clinical management decisions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 20% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 61% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#16,024,934
of 23,784,266 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Roentgenology
#5,974
of 7,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,115
of 167,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Roentgenology
#49
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,784,266 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.