↓ Skip to main content

Genome editing in the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae using the CRISPR/Cas9 system

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Methods and Protocols, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome editing in the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae using the CRISPR/Cas9 system
Published in
Biology Methods and Protocols, February 2020
DOI 10.1093/biomethods/bpaa003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Culp, Cory Richman, Devika Sharanya, Nikita Jhaveri, Wouter van den Berg, Bhagwati P Gupta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Energy 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2022.
All research outputs
#13,403,507
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Biology Methods and Protocols
#49
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,566
of 455,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Methods and Protocols
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.