You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A genome-wide association scan implicates DCHS2, RUNX2, GLI3, PAX1 and EDAR in human facial variation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1038/ncomms11616 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kaustubh Adhikari, Macarena Fuentes-Guajardo, Mirsha Quinto-Sánchez, Javier Mendoza-Revilla, Juan Camilo Chacón-Duque, Victor Acuña-Alonzo, Claudia Jaramillo, William Arias, Rodrigo Barquera Lozano, Gastón Macín Pérez, Jorge Gómez-Valdés, Hugo Villamil-Ramírez, Tábita Hunemeier, Virginia Ramallo, Caio C. Silva de Cerqueira, Malena Hurtado, Valeria Villegas, Vanessa Granja, Carla Gallo, Giovanni Poletti, Lavinia Schuler-Faccini, Francisco M. Salzano, Maria- Cátira Bortolini, Samuel Canizales-Quinteros, Michael Cheeseman, Javier Rosique, Gabriel Bedoya, Francisco Rothhammer, Denis Headon, Rolando González-José, David Balding, Andrés Ruiz-Linares |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 16% |
Spain | 4 | 7% |
Japan | 3 | 5% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Russia | 1 | 2% |
Czechia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 33 | 57% |
Scientists | 20 | 34% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 256 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 20% |
Researcher | 40 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 35 | 13% |
Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
Professor | 17 | 7% |
Other | 51 | 20% |
Unknown | 44 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 77 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 12% |
Arts and Humanities | 9 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
Other | 35 | 13% |
Unknown | 48 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1255. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#10,924
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#219
of 57,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143
of 350,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 837 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 837 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.