↓ Skip to main content

Understanding tidal marsh trajectories: evaluation of multiple indicators of marsh persistence

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding tidal marsh trajectories: evaluation of multiple indicators of marsh persistence
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), December 2019
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab5a94
Authors

Kerstin Wasson, Neil K Ganju, Zafer Defne, Charlie Endris, Tracy Elsey-Quirk, Karen M Thorne, Chase M Freeman, Glenn Guntenspergen, Daniel J Nowacki, Kenneth B Raposa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Student > Master 9 14%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 23 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 27 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,985,142
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#3,142
of 6,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,691
of 474,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#80
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.