↓ Skip to main content

Developing interprofessional communication skills for pharmacists to improve their ability to collaborate with other professions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interprofessional Care, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing interprofessional communication skills for pharmacists to improve their ability to collaborate with other professions
Published in
Journal of Interprofessional Care, May 2016
DOI 10.3109/13561820.2016.1154021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Luetsch, Debra Rowett

Abstract

Successful communication between health professionals is a prerequisite for collaborative practice. Clinical pharmacists completed a learning and practice module introducing them to a framework for successful interprofessional communication (IPC) in the course of their postgraduate studies. A face-to-face discussion of a contemporary clinical topic with a health professional was then scheduled, mainly with junior doctors, in their practice setting. An exploratory case study methodology was employed to investigate pharmacists' written reflections on their experience applying their newly acquired IPC skills. Thematic analysis of reflections developed five categories relating to interprofessional collaboration, learning, and education. Themes describing pharmacists' preconceptions about the health professional and scheduled interprofessional encounter, how it allowed them to learn about doctors' and other health professionals' practice and build collaborative relationships were identified. Reflections also elaborated that applying the communication framework and strengthening of collaboration created opportunities for IPE, with added observations about these increasing potential impact on patient care and change of practice. Analysis of anonymous feedback provided by the health professionals yielded similar themes and was integrated for triangulation. Applying successful IPC skills in healthcare settings may increase interprofessional collaboration and create practice models which facilitate interprofessional learning in health profession programmes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 22%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 11%
Psychology 6 7%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,381,813
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interprofessional Care
#517
of 1,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,634
of 334,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interprofessional Care
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.