You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
International Olympic Committee Consensus Statement: Methods for Recording and Reporting of Epidemiological Data on Injury and Illness in Sports 2020 (Including the STROBE Extension for Sports Injury and Illness Surveillance (STROBE-SIIS))
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/2325967120902908 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
International Olympic Committee Injury and Illness Epidemiology Consensus Group, Roald Bahr, Ben Clarsen, Wayne Derman, Jiri Dvorak, Carolyn A. Emery, Caroline F. Finch, Martin Hägglund, Astrid Junge, Simon Kemp, Karim M. Khan, Stephen W. Marshall, Willem Meeuwisse, Margo Mountjoy, John W. Orchard, Babette Pluim, Kenneth L. Quarrie, Bruce Reider, Martin Schwellnus, Torbjørn Soligard, Keith A. Stokes, Toomas Timpka, Evert Verhagen, Abhinav Bindra, Richard Budgett, Lars Engebretsen, Uğur Erdener, Karim Chamari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 177 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 15% |
| United States | 17 | 10% |
| Spain | 7 | 4% |
| Sweden | 7 | 4% |
| Australia | 7 | 4% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Qatar | 5 | 3% |
| Ireland | 4 | 2% |
| India | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 65 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 85 | 48% |
| Scientists | 57 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 347 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 347 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Researcher | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 63 | 18% |
| Unknown | 150 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 60 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 8% |
| Unknown | 164 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#367,808
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
#32
of 2,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,658
of 384,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
#2
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.