| Title |
Additively manufactured medical products – the FDA perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
3D Printing in Medicine, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41205-016-0005-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Di Prima, James Coburn, David Hwang, Jennifer Kelly, Akm Khairuzzaman, Laura Ricles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 360 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 12% |
| Researcher | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 61 | 17% |
| Unknown | 102 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 86 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 26 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 18 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 63 | 17% |
| Unknown | 124 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,592,548
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from 3D Printing in Medicine
#5
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,828
of 420,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 3D Printing in Medicine
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them