↓ Skip to main content

The efficacy of non-directive supportive therapy for adult depression: A meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychology Review, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
50 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
283 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
387 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The efficacy of non-directive supportive therapy for adult depression: A meta-analysis
Published in
Clinical Psychology Review, February 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.01.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pim Cuijpers, Ellen Driessen, Steven D. Hollon, Patricia van Oppen, Jürgen Barth, Gerhard Andersson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Dominican Republic 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 375 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 14%
Student > Bachelor 52 13%
Researcher 48 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 8%
Other 72 19%
Unknown 66 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 212 55%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 9%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 2%
Arts and Humanities 7 2%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 82 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,114,328
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology Review
#304
of 1,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,945
of 259,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology Review
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.