You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Automatic translation, context, and supervised learning in comparative politics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Information Technology & Politics, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1080/19331681.2020.1731245 |
Authors |
Michael Courtney, Michael Breen, Iain McMenamin, Gemma McNulty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 4 | 21% |
United States | 2 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Comoros | 1 | 5% |
Costa Rica | 1 | 5% |
Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
Austria | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
Scientists | 9 | 47% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 18% |
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 11% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 8 | 29% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
Linguistics | 2 | 7% |
Psychology | 2 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,852,614
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Technology & Politics
#75
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,396
of 383,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Technology & Politics
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.