↓ Skip to main content

Multiple Cognitive Abilities from a Single Cortical Algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple Cognitive Abilities from a Single Cortical Algorithm
Published in
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, September 2012
DOI 10.1162/jocn_a_00250
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanna E. Forwood, Rosemary A. Cowell, Timothy J. Bussey, Lisa M. Saksida

Abstract

One strong claim made by the representational-hierarchical account of cortical function in the ventral visual stream (VVS) is that the VVS is a functional continuum: the basic computations carried out in service of a given cognitive function, such as recognition memory or visual discrimination, might be the same at all points along the VVS. Here, we use a single-layer computational model with a fixed learning mechanism and set of parameters to simulate a variety of cognitive phenomena from different parts of the functional continuum of the VVS: recognition memory, categorization of perceptually related stimuli, perceptual learning of highly similar stimuli, and development of retinotopy and orientation selectivity. The simulation results indicate--consistent with the representational-hierarchical view--that the simple existence of different levels of representational complexity in different parts of the VVS is sufficient to drive the emergence of distinct regions that appear to be specialized for solving a particular task, when a common neurocomputational learning algorithm is assumed across all regions. Thus, our data suggest that it is not necessary to invoke computational differences to understand how different cortical regions can appear to be specialized for what are considered to be very different psychological functions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Other 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 33%
Neuroscience 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Computer Science 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2012.
All research outputs
#5,840,897
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
#814
of 2,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,627
of 171,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.