You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social networks supporting governance of coastal ecosystems in Solomon Islands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00255.x |
| Authors |
Philippa J. Cohen, Louisa S. Evans, Morena Mills |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 251 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 20% |
| Researcher | 53 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 87 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Unknown | 51 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2012.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#972
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,553
of 181,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#19
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.