You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Spatially Explicit, Empirical Estimate of Tree‐Based Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Forests of the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2019gb006241 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anika Staccone, Wenying Liao, Steven Perakis, Jana Compton, Christopher M. Clark, Duncan Menge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 54% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 77% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,691,362
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#595
of 1,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,554
of 360,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.