↓ Skip to main content

Miscarriage, Preterm Delivery, and Stillbirth: Large Variations in Rates within a Cohort of Australian Women

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Miscarriage, Preterm Delivery, and Stillbirth: Large Variations in Rates within a Cohort of Australian Women
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexis J. Hure, Jennifer R. Powers, Gita D. Mishra, Danielle L. Herbert, Julie E. Byles, Deborah Loxton

Abstract

We aimed to use simple clinical questions to group women and provide their specific rates of miscarriage, preterm delivery, and stillbirth for reference. Further, our purpose was to describe who has experienced particularly low or high rates of each event.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 23 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 34%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,421,594
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#18,372
of 201,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,385
of 165,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#284
of 3,773 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,773 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.