You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating, analyzing and synthesizing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Conservation, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00555.x |
| Authors |
H. P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 31% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Kenya | 1 | 6% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 9 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 30% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 4 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2015.
All research outputs
#3,648,844
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Animal Conservation
#498
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,445
of 168,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Conservation
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.