| Title |
Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histopathological Response to Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-012-2309-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Uday Bharat Patel, Gina Brown, Harm Rutten, Nicholas West, David Sebag-Montefiore, Robert Glynne-Jones, Eric Rullier, Marc Peeters, Eric Van Cutsem, Sergio Ricci, Cornelius Van de Velde, Pennert Kjell, Philip Quirke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Greece | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 24% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 66% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 1 | <1% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,656,885
of 23,952,301 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,203
of 6,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,393
of 166,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,952,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.