| Title |
Engaging basic scientists in translational research: identifying opportunities, overcoming obstacles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-10-72 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer A Hobin, Anne M Deschamps, Richard Bockman, Stanley Cohen, Paul Dechow, Charis Eng, William Galey, Mariana Morris, Sharma Prabhakar, Usha Raj, Peter Rubenstein, John A Smith, Patrick Stover, Nancy Sung, William Talman, Richard Galbraith |
| Abstract |
This report is based on the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology's symposium, "Engaging basic Scientists in Translational Research: Identifying Opportunities, Overcoming Obstacles," held in Chevy Chase, MD, March 24-25, 2011. Meeting participants examined the benefits of engaging basic scientists in translational research, the challenges to their participation in translational research, and the roles that research institutions, funding organizations, professional societies, and scientific publishers can play to address these challenges. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 26% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,306,425
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,925
of 3,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,281
of 161,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#41
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.