↓ Skip to main content

Analysing BioHEL using challenging boolean functions

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Intelligence, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Analysing BioHEL using challenging boolean functions
Published in
Evolutionary Intelligence, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12065-012-0080-9
Authors

María A. Franco, Natalio Krasnogor, Jaume Bacardit

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 21%
Unspecified 2 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 14%
Professor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 43%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 21%
Unspecified 2 14%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2012.
All research outputs
#15,243,549
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Intelligence
#28
of 49 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,344
of 164,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Intelligence
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.