↓ Skip to main content

Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 19A in Latin America and the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 1990–2010

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 19A in Latin America and the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 1990–2010
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Castañeda, Clara Inés Agudelo, Rodrigo De Antonio, Diego Rosselli, Claudia Calderón, Eduardo Ortega-Barria, Rómulo E Colindres

Abstract

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) are in the process of implementation in Latin America. Experience in developed countries has shown that they reduce the incidence of invasive and non-invasive disease. However, there is evidence that the introduction of PCVs in universal mass vaccination programs, combined with inappropriate and extensive use of antibiotics, could be associated to changes in non-PCV serotypes, including serotype 19A. We conducted a systematic review to determine the distribution of serotype 19A, burden of pneumococcal disease and antibiotic resistance in the region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 11 9%
Other 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 29 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 37 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2012.
All research outputs
#17,657,116
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,065
of 7,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,408
of 165,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#62
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.