You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cardiovascular mortality and N-terminal-proBNP reduced after combined selenium and coenzyme Q10 supplementation: A 5-year prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial among elderly Swedish citizens
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Cardiology, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.156 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Urban Alehagen, Peter Johansson, Mikael Björnstedt, Anders Rosén, Ulf Dahlström |
Abstract |
Selenium and coenzyme Q10 are essential for the cell. Low cardiac contents of selenium and coenzyme Q10 have been shown in patients with cardiomyopathy, but inconsistent results are published on the effect of supplementation of the two components separately. A vital relationship exists between the two substances to obtain optimal function of the cell. However, reports on combined supplements are lacking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 17% |
Canada | 2 | 7% |
Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 69% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 131 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 14% |
Researcher | 16 | 12% |
Other | 12 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
Other | 24 | 18% |
Unknown | 28 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 11% |
Unknown | 33 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#673,960
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cardiology
#86
of 7,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,258
of 177,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cardiology
#2
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.