You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
diffuse noxious inhibitory controls(DNIC)とconditioned pain modulation(CPM)―その概要とCPM評価法―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.11321/jjspc.18-0018 |
| Authors |
大野 由夏, 小長谷 光 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,427,771
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians
#37
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,509
of 364,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.