↓ Skip to main content

Lung–kidney cross-talk in the critically ill: insights from the Lung Safe study

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lung–kidney cross-talk in the critically ill: insights from the Lung Safe study
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2020
DOI 10.1007/s00134-020-05962-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Rezoagli, B. McNicholas, T. Pham, G. Bellani, J. G. Laffey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 80%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2020.
All research outputs
#18,714,452
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,488
of 5,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,350
of 361,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#114
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.