| Title |
Therapeutic Decision-Making in Endoscopically Unmanageable Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00270-008-9320-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luc Defreyne, Ignace De Schrijver, Johan Decruyenaere, Georges Van Maele, Wim Ceelen, Danny De Looze, Peter Vanlangenhove |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 24% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#791
of 2,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,340
of 99,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,778 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.