Title |
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A(H1N1) severe respiratory failure in Japan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Anesthesia, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00540-012-1402-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shinhiro Takeda, Toru Kotani, Satoshi Nakagawa, Shingo Ichiba, Toshiyuki Aokage, Ryoichi Ochiai, Nobuyuki Taenaka, Kaneyuki Kawamae, Masaji Nishimura, Yoshihito Ujike, Kimitaka Tajimi, Committee of Crisis Control, the Japanese Society of Respiratory Care Medicine and Committee of Pandemic H1N1 Surveillance, the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine |
Abstract |
To evaluate procedures and outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy applied to 2009 influenza A(H1N1) severe respiratory failure patients in Japan. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 40% |
Australia | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
Other | 11 | 21% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 68% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,314,368
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#159
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,021
of 164,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.