You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exome sequencing and the genetic basis of complex traits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.2303 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam Kiezun, Kiran Garimella, Ron Do, Nathan O Stitziel, Benjamin M Neale, Paul J McLaren, Namrata Gupta, Pamela Sklar, Patrick F Sullivan, Jennifer L Moran, Christina M Hultman, Paul Lichtenstein, Patrik Magnusson, Thomas Lehner, Yin Yao Shugart, Alkes L Price, Paul I W de Bakker, Shaun M Purcell, Shamil R Sunyaev |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Uzbekistan | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 21 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 15 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 735 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 4% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Finland | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 2% |
| Unknown | 655 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 217 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 192 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 10% |
| Professor | 39 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 136 | 19% |
| Unknown | 46 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 377 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 109 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 7% |
| Unknown | 60 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,669,836
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#2,350
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,498
of 182,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#25
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.