| Title |
Is the meiofauna a good indicator for climate change and anthropogenic impacts?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biodiversity, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12526-015-0359-z |
| Authors |
Daniela Zeppilli, Jozée Sarrazin, Daniel Leduc, Pedro Martinez Arbizu, Diego Fontaneto, Christophe Fontanier, Andrew J. Gooday, Reinhardt Møbjerg Kristensen, Viatcheslav N. Ivanenko, Martin V. Sørensen, Ann Vanreusel, Julien Thébault, Marianna Mea, Noémie Allio, Thomas Andro, Alexandre Arvigo, Justine Castrec, Morgan Danielo, Valentin Foulon, Raphaelle Fumeron, Ludovic Hermabessiere, Vivien Hulot, Tristan James, Roxanne Langonne-Augen, Tangi Le Bot, Marc Long, Dendy Mahabror, Quentin Morel, Michael Pantalos, Etienne Pouplard, Laura Raimondeau, Antoine Rio-Cabello, Sarah Seite, Gwendoline Traisnel, Kevin Urvoy, Thomas Van Der Stegen, Mariam Weyand, David Fernandes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 370 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 64 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 13% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 14% |
| Unknown | 89 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 115 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 88 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 27 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 4% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Unknown | 105 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#18,458,033
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biodiversity
#478
of 569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,622
of 262,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biodiversity
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.