↓ Skip to main content

Logic gates based on ion transistors

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Logic gates based on ion transistors
Published in
Nature Communications, May 2012
DOI 10.1038/ncomms1869
Pubmed ID
Authors

Klas Tybrandt, Robert Forchheimer, Magnus Berggren

Abstract

Precise control over processing, transport and delivery of ionic and molecular signals is of great importance in numerous fields of life sciences. Integrated circuits based on ion transistors would be one approach to route and dispense complex chemical signal patterns to achieve such control. To date several types of ion transistors have been reported; however, only individual devices have so far been presented and most of them are not functional at physiological salt concentrations. Here we report integrated chemical logic gates based on ion bipolar junction transistors. Inverters and NAND gates of both npn type and complementary type are demonstrated. We find that complementary ion gates have higher gain and lower power consumption, as compared with the single transistor-type gates, which imitates the advantages of complementary logics found in conventional electronics. Ion inverters and NAND gates lay the groundwork for further development of solid-state chemical delivery circuits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Germany 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 193 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 29%
Researcher 36 17%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 27 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 63 30%
Materials Science 36 17%
Chemistry 28 14%
Physics and Astronomy 25 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 30 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,624,755
of 25,035,235 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#22,721
of 55,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,344
of 170,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#31
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,035,235 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.