You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do Voters Judge the Performance of Female and Male Politicians Differently? Experimental Evidence from the United States and Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Political Research Quarterly, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1065912920906193 |
| Authors |
Roosmarijn A. de Geus, John R. McAndrews, Peter John Loewen, Aaron Martin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 20% |
| Canada | 4 | 16% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Georgia | 1 | 4% |
| Poland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 52% |
| Scientists | 10 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 23 | 49% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,237,900
of 25,476,463 outputs
Outputs from Political Research Quarterly
#357
of 1,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,298
of 383,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Research Quarterly
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,476,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.