↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of periodicity in seasonally driven epidemics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Theoretical Biology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants of periodicity in seasonally driven epidemics
Published in
Journal of Theoretical Biology, March 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.02.031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asher Uziel, Lewi Stone

Abstract

Seasonality strongly affects the transmission and spatio-temporal dynamics of many infectious diseases, and is often an important cause for their recurrence. However, there are many open questions regarding the intricate relationship between seasonality and the complex dynamics of infectious diseases it gives rise to. For example, in the analysis of long-term time-series of childhood diseases, it is not clear why there are transitions from regimes with regular annual dynamics, to regimes in which epidemics occur every two or more years, and vice-versa. The classical seasonally-forced SIR epidemic model gives insights into these phenomena but due to its intrinsic nonlinearity and complex dynamics, the model is rarely amenable to detailed mathematical analysis. Making sensible approximations we analytically study the threshold (bifurcation) point of the forced SIR model where there is a switch from annual to biennial epidemics. We derive, for the first time, a simple equation that predicts the relationship between key epidemiological parameters near the bifurcation point. The relationship makes clear that, for realistic values of the parameters, the transition from biennial to annual dynamics will occur if either the birth-rate (μ) or basic reproductive ratio (R(0)) is increased sufficiently, or if the strength of seasonality (δ) is reduced sufficiently. These effects are confirmed in simulations studies and are also in accord with empirical observations. For example, the relationship may explain the correspondence between documented transitions in measles epidemics dynamics and concomitant changes in demographic and environmental factors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Vietnam 1 3%
Israel 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 30 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Mathematics 7 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 19%
Environmental Science 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Theoretical Biology
#2,604
of 4,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,772
of 172,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Theoretical Biology
#19
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.