You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychodynamic Guided Self-Help for Adult Depression through the Internet: A Randomised Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0038021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Johansson, Sigrid Ekbladh, Amanda Hebert, Malin Lindström, Sara Möller, Eleanor Petitt, Stephanie Poysti, Mattias Holmqvist Larsson, Andréas Rousseau, Per Carlbring, Pim Cuijpers, Gerhard Andersson |
| Abstract |
Psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), but not all clients with MDD can receive psychotherapy. Using the Internet to provide psychodynamic treatments is one way of improving access to psychological treatments for MDD. The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to investigate the efficacy of an Internet-based psychodynamic guided self-help treatment for MDD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 25% |
| Egypt | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Japan | 2 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Barbados | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 278 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 15% |
| Researcher | 42 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 154 | 54% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Unknown | 71 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,320,326
of 25,080,267 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#28,446
of 217,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,166
of 170,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#433
of 3,774 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,080,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,774 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.