↓ Skip to main content

The Physiology of Human Defecation

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 4,668)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
Title
The Physiology of Human Defecation
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10620-012-2071-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Somnath Palit, Peter J. Lunniss, S. Mark Scott

Abstract

Human defecation involves integrated and coordinated sensorimotor functions, orchestrated by central, spinal, peripheral (somatic and visceral), and enteric neural activities, acting on a morphologically intact gastrointestinal tract (including the final common path, the pelvic floor, and anal sphincters). The multiple factors that ultimately result in defecation are best appreciated by describing four temporally and physiologically fairly distinct phases. This article details our current understanding of normal defecation, including recent advances, but importantly identifies those areas where knowledge or consensus is still lacking. Appreciation of normal physiology is central to directed treatment of constipation and also of fecal incontinence, which are prevalent in the general population and cause significant morbidity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 249 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Master 27 11%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 71 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 7%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 71 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#408,143
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#26
of 4,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,774
of 168,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.