You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Dental Medicine, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.03.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dena Eltahlah, Christopher D Lynch, Barbara L Chadwick, Igor R Blum, Nairn H F Wilson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 73 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 41% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 77 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Dental Medicine
#1,349
of 1,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,252
of 347,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Dental Medicine
#21
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.