↓ Skip to main content

Back to past leeches: repeated phlebotomies and cardiovascular risk

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Back to past leeches: repeated phlebotomies and cardiovascular risk
Published in
BMC Medicine, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-53
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melania Manco, Josè Manuel Fernandez-Real

Abstract

In patients with metabolic syndrome, body iron overload exacerbates insulin resistance, impairment of glucose metabolism, endothelium dysfunction and coronary artery responses. Conversely, iron depletion is effective to ameliorate glucose metabolism and dysfunctional endothelium. Most of its effectiveness seems to occur through the amelioration of systemic and hepatic insulin resistance. In a study published by BMC Medicine, Michalsen et al. demonstrated a dramatic improvement of blood pressure, serum glucose and lipids after removing 550 to 800 ml of blood in subjects with metabolic syndrome. This effect was apparently independent of changes in insulin resistance, in contrast to previous cross-sectional and cohort studies investigating the association between iron overload, insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease. Despite drawbacks in the study design, its findings may lead the way to investigations aimed at exploring iron-dependent regulatory mechanisms of vascular tone in healthy individuals and patients with metabolic disease, thus providing a rationale for novel preventive and therapeutic strategies to counteract hypertension. Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/54.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 10 30%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Psychology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,271,940
of 25,080,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#883
of 3,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,974
of 170,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,080,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.