| Title |
Rare neonatal diabetes insipidus and associated late risks: Case report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-12-56 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maximiliano Francisco Rivas-Crespo, Lorena Miñones-Suárez, Susana Serrano G-Gallarza |
| Abstract |
Most cases of neonatal central diabetes insipidus are caused by an injury, which often results in other handicaps in the patient. The infant's prognosis will be determined by his or her own early age and disability as well as by the physician's skill. However, the rarity of this condition prevents the acquisition of personal experience dealing with it. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2012.
All research outputs
#15,243,549
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,017
of 2,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,790
of 165,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#27
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.