You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tea Consumption and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in Europe: The EPIC-InterAct Case-Cohort Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0036910 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geertruida J van Woudenbergh, Anneleen Kuijsten, Dagmar Drogan, Daphne L van der A, Dora Romaguera, Eva Ardanaz, Pilar Amiano, Aurelio Barricarte, Joline W J Beulens, Heiner Boeing, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Christina C Dahm, M-Doleres Chirlaque, Francoise Clavel, Francesca L Crowe, Piia-Piret Eomois, Guy Fagherazzi, Paul W Franks, Jytte Halkjaer, Kay T Khaw, Giovanna Masala, Amalia Mattiello, Peter Nilsson, Kim Overvad, J Ramón Quirós, Olov Rolandsson, Isabelle Romieu, Carlotta Sacerdote, María-José Sánchez, Matthias B Schulze, Nadia Slimani, Ivonne Sluijs, Annemieke M W Spijkerman, Giovanna Tagliabue, Anne Tjønneland, Rosario Tumino, Nita G Forouhi, Stephen Sharp, Claudia Langenberg, Edith J M Feskens, Elio Riboli, Nicholas J Wareham |
| Abstract |
In previous meta-analyses, tea consumption has been associated with lower incidence of type 2 diabetes. It is unclear, however, if tea is associated inversely over the entire range of intake. Therefore, we investigated the association between tea consumption and incidence of type 2 diabetes in a European population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 27% |
| Canada | 6 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| Spain | 4 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 73% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Ghana | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#491,950
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,945
of 206,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,429
of 167,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#89
of 3,753 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,753 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.