↓ Skip to main content

Gender Differences in the Longitudinal Impact of Exposure to Violence on Mental Health in Urban Youth

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Gender Differences in the Longitudinal Impact of Exposure to Violence on Mental Health in Urban Youth
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10964-011-9649-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Zona, Stephanie Milan

Abstract

There is evidence of gender differences in psychopathology during adolescence, but little research has investigated gender differences in trauma-related symptoms. Exposure to violence is a commonly experienced potentially traumatic event among urban adolescents, and the few studies examining gender differences in its mental health impact have produced inconsistent findings. The present study examines the moderating effects of gender on the longitudinal association between exposure to violence and a variety of mental health symptoms (externalizing, internalizing, PTSD, dissociation) in a racially diverse urban adolescent sample (N = 615; 50.6% female; Time 1 mean age = 14.15; Time 2 mean age = 16.70). For both genders, exposure to violence prospectively predicted increases in all types of symptoms. Although boys reported more exposure to violence on average, girls experiencing violence were more likely to experience dissociative (but not PTSD, internalizing, or externalizing) symptoms. The results suggest that adolescent girls exposed to potentially traumatic events may be especially vulnerable to experiencing certain trauma-related symptoms and imply gender-specific pathways to trauma-related psychopathology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 143 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 21%
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 45%
Social Sciences 28 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 26 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,469,784
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#516
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,034
of 110,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.