Title |
Cardiovascular Mortality After Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in Young Adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.052 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Avinainder Singh, Ankur Gupta, Ersilia M. DeFilippis, Arman Qamar, David W. Biery, Zaid Almarzooq, Bradley Collins, Amber Fatima, Candace Jackson, Patrycja Galazka, Mattheus Ramsis, Daniel C. Pipilas, Sanjay Divakaran, Mary Cawley, Jon Hainer, Josh Klein, Petr Jarolim, Khurram Nasir, James L. Januzzi, Marcelo F. Di Carli, Deepak L. Bhatt, Ron Blankstein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 26 | 23% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
Germany | 5 | 4% |
Spain | 4 | 4% |
Mexico | 3 | 3% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Argentina | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 2 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 17% |
Unknown | 40 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 69 | 62% |
Scientists | 22 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Other | 11 | 20% |
Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 52% |
Psychology | 2 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#477,085
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,191
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,812
of 383,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#23
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.