↓ Skip to main content

CSF Biomarkers and Incipient Alzheimer Disease in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
909 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
565 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CSF Biomarkers and Incipient Alzheimer Disease in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2009
DOI 10.1001/jama.2009.1064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niklas Mattsson, Henrik Zetterberg, Oskar Hansson, Niels Andreasen, Lucilla Parnetti, Michael Jonsson, Sanna-Kaisa Herukka, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Marinus A. Blankenstein, Michael Ewers, Kenneth Rich, Elmar Kaiser, Marcel Verbeek, Magda Tsolaki, Ezra Mulugeta, Erik Rosén, Dag Aarsland, Pieter Jelle Visser, Johannes Schröder, Jan Marcusson, Mony de Leon, Harald Hampel, Philip Scheltens, Tuula Pirttilä, Anders Wallin, Maria Eriksdotter Jönhagen, Lennart Minthon, Bengt Winblad, Kaj Blennow

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 565 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 535 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 20%
Researcher 105 19%
Student > Bachelor 61 11%
Student > Master 56 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 7%
Other 90 16%
Unknown 101 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 149 26%
Neuroscience 85 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 7%
Psychology 18 3%
Other 77 14%
Unknown 139 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,937,184
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#12,245
of 36,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,281
of 122,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#36
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.