You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fiber intake and total and cause-specific mortality in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.111.028415 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shu-Chun Chuang, Teresa Norat, Neil Murphy, Anja Olsen, Anne Tjønneland, Kim Overvad, Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault, Florence Perquier, Laureen Dartois, Rudolf Kaaks, Birgit Teucher, Manuela M Bergmann, Heiner Boeing, Antonia Trichopoulou, Pagona Lagiou, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Sara Grioni, Carlotta Sacerdote, Salvatore Panico, Domenico Palli, Rosario Tumino, Petra H M Peeters, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Martine M Ros, Magritt Brustad, Lene Angell Åsli, Guri Skeie, J Ramón Quirós, Carlos A González, María-José Sánchez, Carmen Navarro, Eva Ardanaz Aicua, Miren Dorronsoro, Isabel Drake, Emily Sonestedt, Ingegerd Johansson, Göran Hallmans, Timothy Key, Francesca Crowe, Kay-Tee Khaw, Nicholas Wareham, Pietro Ferrari, Nadia Slimani, Isabelle Romieu, Valentina Gallo, Elio Riboli, Paolo Vineis |
| Abstract |
Previous studies have shown that high fiber intake is associated with lower mortality. However, little is known about the association of dietary fiber with specific causes of death other than cardiovascular disease (CVD). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 28% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 44% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Cyprus | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,190,071
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#2,253
of 12,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,417
of 178,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#20
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.