You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
錯視と圏論
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.11225/jcss.26.482 |
| Authors |
高橋 康介 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 50% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,277,313
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#38
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,855
of 480,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.