↓ Skip to main content

Pay for Obesity? Pay-for-Performance Metrics Neglect Increased Complication Rates and Cost for Obese Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Pay for Obesity? Pay-for-Performance Metrics Neglect Increased Complication Rates and Cost for Obese Patients
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11605-011-1529-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenzo Hirose, Andrew D. Shore, Elizabeth C. Wick, Jonathan P. Weiner, Martin A. Makary

Abstract

Rates of surgical complications are increasingly being used for pay-for-performance reimbursement structures. We hypothesize that morbid obesity has a significant effect on complication rates and costs following commonly performed general surgical procedures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Chile 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 43 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#665
of 2,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,272
of 121,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.