↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility and accuracy of medication checks via Internet video

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility and accuracy of medication checks via Internet video
Published in
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, February 2012
DOI 10.1258/jtt.2012.sft102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie Bradford, Nigel R Armfield, Jeanine Young, Anthony C Smith

Abstract

We investigated the feasibility and accuracy of using Internet-based videoconferencing for double-checking medications. Ten participants checked 30 different medications using a desktop PC and a webcam. The accuracy of the video-based checks was compared with 'face-to-vial' checks. The checks included the drug name, dosage and expiry dates of ampoules, vials and tablets, as well as graduations on syringes. There was 100% accuracy for drug name, dosage, and graduations on syringes greater than 1 unit. The expiry dates proved more difficult to read, and accuracy was only 63%. The mean overall accuracy was 91% for all items. Internet video-based medication double-checks may have a useful role to play in processes to ensure the safe use of medications in home care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 28%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Social Sciences 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,109,554
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
#312
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,385
of 156,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.