↓ Skip to main content

Mobilized peripheral blood stem cells compared with bone marrow from HLA‐identical siblings for reduced‐intensity conditioning transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission: a…

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Haematology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mobilized peripheral blood stem cells compared with bone marrow from HLA‐identical siblings for reduced‐intensity conditioning transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission: a retrospective analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT
Published in
European Journal of Haematology, July 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2012.01811.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arnon Nagler, Myriam Labopin, Avichai Shimoni, Ghulam J. Mufti, Jan J. Cornelissen, Didier Blaise, Jeroen J. W. M. Janssen, Noel Milpied, Lars Vindelov, Eefke Petersen, John Gribben, Andrea Bacigalupo, Claes Malm, Dietger Niederwieser, Gerard J. Socié, Renate Arnold, Paul Brown, Hakan Goker, Vanderson Rocha, Mohamad Mohty, The ALWP‐EBMT

Abstract

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC)-alloSCT is increasingly used for acute myelogenous leukemia. Limited data are available for the comparison of peripheral blood stem cells with bone marrow for RIC-alloSCT. We used the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) ALWP data to compare the outcome of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) (n = 1430) vs. bone marrow (BM) (n = 107) for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients with complete remission that underwent RIC-alloSCT from compatible sibling donors. The leukemia features, the disease status, and the time from diagnosis were similar between the two groups. Engraftment was achieved in 99% and 93% in the PBSC and BM groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). The day of engraftment was significantly earlier for the PBSC vs. the BM group, 15 (1-59) and 19 (5-69), respectively (P < 0.001). Acute GVHD, severe GVHD (grade III-IV) and chronic GVHD did not differ between the groups. leukemia-free survival (LFS), relapse, and non-relapsed mortality (NRM) were 51 ± 2%, 32 ± 1%, and 17 ± 1% vs. 50 ± 6%, 38 ± 6%, and 12 ± 3% for the PBSC and BM groups, respectively. Our results indicate faster engraftment, but no difference in GVHD, LFS, relapse, and NRM when comparing PBSC to BM grafts from sibling donors following RIC conditioning. This is the first study comparing PBSC to BM grafts in the RIC setting, analyzing a homogeneous population of patients with AML in remission. Whether PBSC should be preferred for advanced phases of the disease, where the outcome is dominated by relapse incidences, needs further investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Psychology 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2012.
All research outputs
#22,834,739
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Haematology
#1,635
of 1,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,902
of 177,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Haematology
#19
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,864 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.