↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of patient access to medical records in the acute setting: practicalities, perspectives and ethical consequences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of patient access to medical records in the acute setting: practicalities, perspectives and ethical consequences
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12910-020-0459-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie N. D’Costa, Isla L. Kuhn, Zoë Fritz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Librarian 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 26 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 30 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,160,925
of 24,053,881 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#337
of 1,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,113
of 363,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,053,881 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.