You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A qualitative study of design stakeholders’ views of developing and implementing a registry-based learning health system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-0976-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary Dixon-Woods, Anne Campbell, Trillium Chang, Graham Martin, Alexandros Georgiadis, Veronica Heney, Sarah Chew, Aricca Van Citters, Kathryn A. Sabadosa, Eugene C. Nelson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 26% |
| United States | 10 | 14% |
| Australia | 5 | 7% |
| Ireland | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 51% |
| Scientists | 22 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 21% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 36 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,020,557
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#143
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,840
of 388,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.