↓ Skip to main content

A Review of 3D Printing Techniques and the Future in Biofabrication of Bioprinted Tissue

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
Title
A Review of 3D Printing Techniques and the Future in Biofabrication of Bioprinted Tissue
Published in
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12013-016-0730-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satyajit Patra, Vanesa Young

Abstract

3D printing has been around in the art, micro-engineering, and manufacturing worlds for decades. Similarly, research for traditionally engineered skin tissue has been in the works since the 1990s. As of recent years, the medical field also began to take advantage of the untapped potential of 3D printing for the biofabrication of tissue. To do so, researchers created a set of goals for fabricated tissues based on the characteristics of natural human tissues and organs. Fabricated tissue was then measured against this set of standards. Researchers were interested in not only creating tissue that functioned like natural tissues but in creating techniques for 3D printing that would print tissues quickly, efficiently, and ultimately result in the ability to mass produce fabricated tissues. Three promising methods of 3D printing emerged from their research: thermal inkjet printing with bioink, direct-write bioprinting, and organ printing using tissue spheroids. This review will discuss all three printing techniques, as well as their advantages, disadvantages, and the possibility of future advancements in the field of tissue fabrication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 375 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 19%
Student > Master 69 18%
Student > Bachelor 38 10%
Researcher 36 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 49 13%
Unknown 88 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 92 24%
Materials Science 43 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 6%
Chemistry 20 5%
Other 54 14%
Unknown 112 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,244,681
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#112
of 1,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,857
of 349,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,020 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.