| Title |
Continuous, non-invasive techniques to determine cardiac output in children after cardiac surgery: evaluation of transesophageal Doppler and electric velocimetry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10877-008-9133-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephan Schubert, Thomas Schmitz, Markus Weiss, Nicole Nagdyman, Michael Huebler, Vladimir Alexi-Meskishvili, Felix Berger, Brigitte Stiller |
| Abstract |
Continuous and non-invasive measurement of cardiac output (CO) may contribute helpful information to the care and treatment of the critically ill pediatric patient. Different methods are available but their clinical verification is still a major problem. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 32% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2012.
All research outputs
#14,728,447
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#378
of 658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,934
of 81,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.