| Title |
Nonculprit Lesion Myocardial Infarction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.067 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin M. Scirica, Brian A. Bergmark, David A. Morrow, Elliott M. Antman, Marc P. Bonaca, Sabina A. Murphy, Marc S. Sabatine, Eugene Braunwald, Stephen D. Wiviott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 59% |
| Scientists | 8 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,611,448
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#3,695
of 16,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,225
of 384,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#106
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.