You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can simulation replace part of clinical time? Two parallel randomised controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Education, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04295.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Watson, Anthony Wright, Norman Morris, Joan McMeeken, Darren Rivett, Felicity Blackstock, Anne Jones, Terry Haines, Vivienne O’Connor, Geoffrey Watson, Raymond Peterson, Gwendolen Jull |
| Abstract |
Education in simulated learning environments (SLEs) has grown rapidly across health care professions, yet no substantive randomised controlled trial (RCT) has investigated whether SLEs can, in part, substitute for traditional clinical education. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| Norway | 1 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 272 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 11% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 81 | 28% |
| Unknown | 68 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 9% |
| Psychology | 17 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 76 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,648,844
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Medical Education
#707
of 2,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,595
of 169,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Education
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.