↓ Skip to main content

Preweaning Over- and Underfeeding Alters Onset of Puberty in the Rat Without Affecting Kisspeptin1

Overview of attention for article published in Biology of Reproduction, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preweaning Over- and Underfeeding Alters Onset of Puberty in the Rat Without Affecting Kisspeptin1
Published in
Biology of Reproduction, May 2012
DOI 10.1095/biolreprod.111.097758
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy T. Smith, Sarah J. Spencer

Abstract

The perinatal nutritional environment can permanently influence body weight, potentially leading to changes in puberty onset and reproductive function. We hypothesized that perinatal under- or overfeeding would alter puberty onset and influence concentrations of a neuropeptide crucial for successful puberty, kisspeptin. We manipulated Wistar rat litter sizes to derive small (SL), control (CL), and large (LL) litters containing 4, 12, and 20 rat pups respectively. This manipulation results in an overweight phenotype in SL rats and a lean phenotype in LL that persists throughout life. To investigate whether successful puberty onset is affected by neonatal under- or overfeeding, we examined indices of growth and development, including the onset of puberty, as well as the central expression of Kiss1 mRNA in these pups. Male LL rats reached puberty later than those from CL. These males also had reduced plasma testosterone and elevated 17beta-estradiol concentrations at puberty. The age at puberty onset was not affected in SL males despite accelerated growth. In females, puberty onset was not significantly delayed by having a lean phenotype, and steroid hormones were not affected. The age at onset was, however, younger in the SL females. Kiss1 mRNA in the hypothalamus was not affected by neonatal nutrition either at puberty or 7 days later. Our findings show early life underfeeding in males and overfeeding in females significantly affects puberty onset, altering steroid hormone concentrations in males, but this is not related to changes in hypothalamic kisspeptin.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 27%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 40%
Neuroscience 5 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 7%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Reproduction
#3,509
of 4,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,537
of 176,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Reproduction
#16
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,933 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.