↓ Skip to main content

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
4480 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4650 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2020
DOI 10.1001/jama.2020.3786
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenling Wang, Yanli Xu, Ruqin Gao, Roujian Lu, Kai Han, Guizhen Wu, Wenjie Tan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,307 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,650 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4650 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 581 12%
Student > Bachelor 498 11%
Student > Master 398 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 367 8%
Other 341 7%
Other 992 21%
Unknown 1473 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1263 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 392 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 196 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 183 4%
Engineering 144 3%
Other 765 16%
Unknown 1707 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,969
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#68
of 36,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140
of 390,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#7
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.